WINE PUNK: P-3-19-19-1

*Due to copyright, access is restricted
**A slight delay in load time, 15 seconds to 45 seconds, due to the size of the model.
***These charts are an aggregate of an entire library, will take 5 to 7 minutes to load informatic. Additionally to select, or type term to activate the model will take 30 seconds to a minute to activate. Once activated the model will run smoothly. Current technology lags behind informatic innovation.

So if you want to be a "wine expert" here you go. It's not that hard. Though 11 layers of wine narrative isn't necessary. I did this, just to put the show of cosmetic authority with wine to bed. This knowledgebase has little to do with expertise, rather discussions of wine have more to do with the art of selective narrative than the wine itself, as one can trace the design of the narrative to see that, the category, as indicated by the dominant node, entitled "wine," is being emphasized (vs. a relational analysis, like the design of Plato). That is, the irrational agency, of embodied performance is being emphasized and not to any degree of specificity as nodes connecting to the dominant node are typically generalized and vague (Differing from scientific narrative that is categorical and specific, like phage research). So by all means, to those in the court, to those working hard to be the best cosmetic authorities they can be, practice your play with words, achieve your levels, but those who trace the design know what wine expertise, as opposed to wine assistance, actually is. And yes, there are ways of identifying select forms of wine production and studying about these specific productions, but creative forms, of new methods, like old world styles from new world producers, or new world styles from old world producers will not hold to any significant form of examination, as it is the show with what is predictable that holds the anecdotal focus for examination; Fit for cosmetic authority. Wine Punks need not apply. Cheers!